Talk:Icosahedral twins/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Icosahedral twins. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Audience and context
What is the audience for this article? I have a Physics degree and I was able to figure it out, but I don't think our typical reader will say anything but "huh". It would be nice if the lead section gave more context, explaining the general domain in which this information is relevant. DES (talk) 22:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Is this related to: Compound of ten tetrahedra? Tom Ruen (talk) 21:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
I agree with the first comment; it is hard to understand (it is also not really right). It badly needs to be rewritten. It should not be related to Compound of ten tetrahedral Ldm001 (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Page is adequate
I am leaving the name "icosahedral twinning" although it really should include MTPs in general. It is kind-off OK now. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)