Talk:Iconodulism

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move to Wiktionary

As I said about the iconoclast article, it is not much more than a detailed dictionary entry. This article does not look like it is going in a encyclopedic directior or has the potential to do so.--chemica 21:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ. It's a stub, not a dicdef. The history of iconodulism and famous iconodulists could be included in the article (not that I know the subject myself). 25 articles on iconodulism or iconodulists already link to this article, so it is in need of expansion, not deletion.--Father Goose 21:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Surely it should be merged with Byzantine iconoclasm since it adds very little if anything to that page, and is actually at odd with that page. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 12:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But is the use of the word entirely restricted to Byzantines? I think not. Johnbod (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Softening on this .... Johnbod (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]