Talk:I Am... Sasha Fierce/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jennie--x (talk · contribs) 20:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

General comment from a pop music editor. I already asked the nominator, however, obviously he didn't do my point. I Am... Sasha Fierce was edited from it's beginning by Jivesh boodhun and he made 890 contributions on the article of course being its top contributor. The nominator Hahc21 has not even made 10 contributions on the article. Obviously he even didn't credit Jivesh as second nominator. As for that I suggest a withdrawal on this nomination, as Hahc21 does not have the right to nominate the article. — Tomica (talk) 18:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support withdraw per above. Best, Jona ^{talk to me} 23:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was out to personal businness and completely forgot about this. Please excuse me, i have added Jivesh's name :) And actually, anyone has the right to nominate the article. I want the article reach GA status but not to say that i made it reach it such status. I now it was Jivesh, but as he's not editing too much, i decided to go and nominate it myself so it can reach GA status. — ΛΧΣ21™ 06:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and as a reviewer and common member of the GA review crew, i have to say this: The fact that the nominator is not the top contributor has nothing to do with this. This is not FAC boys. Anyone can credit themselves as helping improve an article to GA status. I have worked on some articles other people nominated to GA, and i just came in the review and helped. I didn't asked the user to withdraw the nomination, which i consider ridiculous even when i understand your point. I know Jivesh wrote the article to what it is now, but the mere fact that i nominated it doesn't mean i'm trying to overtake his work. That's not how this works gentlemen. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21™ 06:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. Jennie | ☎ 20:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21™ 06:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When will this start? Thanks. — ΛΧΣ21™ 05:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This week, sorry for the delay! :) Jennie | ☎ 21:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Comments

Lead

Y

Development

A huge quote in this section - but there is no source? Can this be cited, please? Done

Production and recording

Again, the sentence beginning "She affirmed, "I love singing ballads..." is a long quote with no source. Can this be cited, please? Done

Composition

Citation needed tag in Musical style and lyrical content needs sourcing/removing. Done

Release

Y

Promotion

Y

Reception

Y

Track listing

Y

Personnel

Y

Charts and certifications

Y

Release history

Y

Overall Summary

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): ✓ Pass b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): ✓ Pass It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): ✓ Pass b (citations to reliable sources): ✓ Pass c (OR): ✓ Pass It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): ✓ Pass b (focused): ✓ Pass It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: ✓ Pass It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: ✓ Pass It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): ✓ Pass b (appropriate use with suitable captions): ✓ Pass
Overall: Pass/Fail: ✓ Pass
· · ·