Talk:Humber scout car

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Humber scout car article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Variants

WarWheels ( http://www.warwheels.net/BritishArmouredCarProductionFiguresArticleBROWN.html ) citing the "Half Yearly Reports on the Progress of the Royal Armoured Corps" : The Mark II will not incorporate the P.L.M. Mounting, since it has been necessary to delete this, the roof, and other items to counterbalance the increase in the weight of the additional Belly armour. On the other side, Forty only say the Mk II was heavier and had different transmission. Also, WarWheels article about the vehicle is called "Humber Scout Car Mark Ib" ( http://www.warwheels.net/humberscoutcarINDEX.html ). However, I was unable to find any information about variant called "Mk Ib". Can somebody clarify on variants and exact differences between them ? Bukvoed 10:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]