Jump to content

Talk:House of Khurshidbanu Natavan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Same place

[edit]

There's an open discussion in Palace of Karabakh Khans questioning whether these 2 are same places. You can participate if you'd like. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 18:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

[edit]

Hi, Solavirum, in regards to our discussion in your talk page. Seems that you do not have access to Avalov (1977), p. 60. On Azerbaijani Wikipedia, the given source is used once (the same p. 60) not to support the construction date of 18th or 19th century but rather "Kərbəlayi Səfixan Qarabaği". The other work being cited, Kaziev (1966), it's used to support (from Russian Wikipedia): "It belongs to the old residential buildings of the 18th- 19th centuries." But seems (from what is available to me, at least) that the source supports that it was one of the buildings built in that time-frame, not that this particular building might have been built in the 18th century. In fact, we can't beyond doubt attribute it to a given architect of the 19 century, if we're assuming that it might have been built earlier. Also in the Shusha article, the given date for the house is late 19th century or early 20th century. Hemşinli çocuk 18:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've only translated the Azerbaijani and Russian Wikipedia articles on the topic. I don't have access to the sources. Though what I can speculate is that the existing sources say 18th century, unknown architect, and 19th century, by the architect Garabaghi. Also, the Shusha article doesn't seem to be citing anything. Maybe CuriousGolden can help? --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 19:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Azerbaijani article was expanded by Sefer azeri, maybe he has access to the cited sources. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 19:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ermenermin, Nhttp://az.wiki.x.io/wiki/%C5%9E%C9%99kil:Avalov_60.JPG here] is Avalov 60. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 16:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]