Talk:Hope Pym

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

File:Evangeline Lilly as Wasp in Ant-Man and the Wasp.jpg

I suggest we replace File:Evangeline Lilly as Wasp in Ant-Man and the Wasp.jpg with File:Evangeline Lilly and Paul Rudd as Wasp and Ant-Man.jpg that shows the complete non-free costume including the helmet. We have lots of free alternatives of Lilly’s face in use in her own article if one wishes to see what she looks like. @Richiekim and Aspects:.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In my edit summary, I said you should either start a discussion here or at WP:FfD, so I am unsure why you would start discussions in both locations about the same subject. As such, please see my response to the FfD. Aspects (talk) 01:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Becuase this isssue can either be resolved on a policy basis (Ffd) or on an editorial basis through discussion here.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 June 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page in the current discussion, although it may be worth revisiting this issue in the future. Dekimasuよ! 21:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hope Pym → Hope van Dyne – The Hope van Dyne iteration of this character is far better known than Hope Pym. All but two of the fifteen sources refer to van Dyne. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 04:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 16:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it's moved, it needs to be re-written so the van Dyne character is the primary focus instead of tucked at the bottom as "other media". Argento Surfer (talk) 12:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the move goes through, I'd be willing to do that. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 16:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Given that van Dyne is an adaption of Pym, I suggest page remain as is. If van Dyne is independently notable then I suggest the page be split and this page moved to List of Marvel Comics characters: P.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Clear WP:COMMONNAME ([1] vs. [2]). The minor comics character "Hope Pym" is much less significant than the film version, "Hope van Dyne", a main character in two high profile films and counting.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per TriiipleThreat. BOZ (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Van Dyne is an adaptation getting a WP:RECENTISM boost. —Lowellian (reply) 01:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.