Talk:Holochroal eye

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect

Do we really need this page? Or just re-direct to Trilobite?? Psuedomorph (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page has the scope to be expanded (e.g. the physics etc); it is about a subject in its own right. The eyes section of trilobite is already quite long and messy. I think we should keep this page; I'll expand it further when I get the opportunity. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 14:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In that case how about moving some of the material from trilobite over & same with the other sections? I agree with the length of the eye section in trilobite being too long (mostly my fault), and so sort 2+ problems at the same time. Psuedomorph (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me! Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 13:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the games a foot... Psuedomorph (talk) 15:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection... does Trilobite Eye seem better as a page with the 3 types within it? Would save a lot repetition on different pages... Psuedomorph (talk) 15:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]