Talk:Harvington Hall

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Entire article copied and pasted from a web site

I'm not quite sure what to do about this:
AfD, PROD, re-write, warn author? There is even a link at the bottom saying it has been copied. I'm surprised that none of the subsequent editors have mentioned this. I've tagged it as copied, and it needs a discussion.--Kudpung (talk) 15:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have stubbified the article to remove the copyvio, now it just needs expanding again! Jenuk1985 | Talk 15:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly. It should also be removed from the history of the article. Kbthompson (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of a specific policy for that, and I certainly haven't seen it done before, usually simply removing the copyvio text is sufficient. Jenuk1985 | Talk 16:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's been done now. Generally speaking, a clear copyviol gets the whole article speedy deleted and someone has to come along and recreate it. If a page contains material which infringes copyright, that material – and the whole page, if there is no other material present – should be removed. - see WP:COPYVIO. A quick google showed that nearly all of the text was taken directly from the official website. Well done for noticing and keeping the salvageable. Kbthompson (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]