Talk:HTC One (M7)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 22:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm seeing this as almost certainly a good article.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
All this needs is some references where the cn tags are added, and the article can be made a GA. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 09:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Done. ViperSnake151 Talk 18:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- That was anazingly quick. Alright, a GA I think this can be! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- It is now a GA! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- That was anazingly quick. Alright, a GA I think this can be! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Done. ViperSnake151 Talk 18:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)