Talk:HMS Midge (1913)

HMS Midge (1913) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 5, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Midge (1913)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 18:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 02:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

@Simongraham: I intend to review this article for GA class. I've skimmed it and it looks well-written. Djmaschek (talk) 02:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review 1

@Simongraham: Each issue is listed below, together with its location. Please either fix or argue your case for not fixing it. Unless I find something earth-shaking, this seems to be the whole list. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 03:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria: Well-written, Verifiable (spot checked web sources), Broad, Neutral, Stable, Illustrated. Done
Introduction: "The Acasta class were" > Better: "The Acasta class destroyers were" or "The Acasta class was". Done
Mismatch: Infobox: Draught = 10ft 6in. Text: Draught = 10ft 5in. Done
Mismatch: Infobox: Displacement = 936 long tons. Text: Displacement = 892 long tons normal & 1,072 deep load. Done
Design and development, paragraph 3: "the torpedo tubes and one of the 4-inch guns was removed" > "were removed". Done
Mismatch: Infobox: Completed = March 1913. Text: Completed = March 1914. (Construction and career, paragraph 1) Done
Construction and career, paragraph 3: "22:30 hr" > "22:30 hours". (I'm not sure what is commonly done, but hr looks wrong.) Done
References: The Jellicoe ref is not in alphabetical order. Done

@Djmaschek: Thank you for this review. I concur with all your comments and, hopefully, have made the amendments that are needed. I also added a couple of categories that I think are helpful. Please tell me if there is anything else that you notice. simongraham (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Simongraham: The article is accepted as GA class. Djmaschek (talk) 04:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Djmaschek: Thank you. That is very kind. simongraham (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]