This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Can the editor variously appearing as the AOL proxy addresses 172.142.49.12, 172.189.61.234, 172.201.254.55, and 172.202.216.148, who has already violated WP:TRR, justify the repeated reinstating of unsourced POV material and deletions of relevant material in this article? Deor04:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the excision of the unsourced paragraph about W.'s appearance, voice, and personal habits; however, the material about the existence and source of misogyny and violence in his stories is equally unsourced and is certainly speculative (constituting a clear violation of WP:OR), as is the identification of Clinton with Crowley. This material should be readded only if reliable sources supporting the statements are cited. Further sources for, and expansion of, the biographical information in the article would also be welcome, as the article is rather thin on details of his life, and some of the details are contradicted by information I've seen elsewhere. It would be nice if editors would concentrate on adding verifiable material to the article, and verifying the material that's already present, rather than inserting their own essays in literary criticism. Wikipedia is the place for the former, not the latter. Deor (talk) 16:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
