Talk:Gwalior Fort

A fact from Gwalior Fort appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that during India's Mughal period, the Gwalior Fort (pictured) was used for imprisoning and killing royal princes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/November.

Wikipedia

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / Asian / Indian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

better photo for this article

Better photos for this article can be sourced from http://mea.gov.in/indiaperspective/2008/01200901.pdf, page 26. The website is a goverment of India website and hence should be free from copyright issues —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kedar Borhade (talk • contribs) 11:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Government of India does not release all its iste contents in public domain like USA. The images need to be checked for copyright. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Some of the text duplicates this.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 21:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dynastic lists

The article contains a number of dynastic lists which seem out of place in an article about a structure. I propose to delete them and replace a short summary when necessary. Any thoughts or objections? Rsloch (talk) 13:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Major historical resource on the web

It includes text of several major inscriptions. Malaiya (talk)

Copy edit

I've done a copy edit of this so I'll leave it a while to see if there are other suggestions. Kind regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 06:22, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Factual accuracy

This article needs better sources and more inline sources. There have been a slew of changes to numbers, dates, and other items in this article. Same issue is happening at Gwalior. I do have concerns about a block evasion/vandalism etc. But it is difficult to tell what is accurate at this point. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent reverts

@Donchocolate: What is up with your recent reverts, you leave no WP:EDITSUMMARY, disruptively revert multiple times and are on the verge of breaching WP:3RR. The edits only pertain basic WP:MOS cleanup it makes no sense to revert them. Explain, an WP:ANI report is coming otherwise. Gotitbro (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also not leaving any summary. Just editing without leaving any refrence. Can you please explain why did you remove the refrence 2 from the page. If you can't provide summary edit then you might get blocked Donchocolate (talk) 08:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn the difference between an WP:EDITSUMMARY and WP:CITATION. And that reference was an WP:EXTERNALLINK which should not be in articles and that [Gopagiri] also pertains to the name of the hill not the fort and is better suited for the body and not the WP:LEAD. I will restore it as a citation and name in the etymology section. Please read WP:MOS and Wikipedia:Competence is required.

And be wary of further reverts that is a blockable breach of WP:3RR. Gotitbro (talk) 08:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]