Talk:Guru Dutt: An Unfinished Story
Appearance
![]() | Guru Dutt: An Unfinished Story has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 29, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Guru Dutt: An Unfinished Story/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Non-free use rationale looks good.
- Add a serial comma after "close friends".
Synopsis
[edit]- "became Indian official submission" → "became the Indian official submission" or "became the official submission from India"
- Is the hyphen between "commercially-successful" necessary in this section?
Development and writing
[edit]- "It was 2004 when Yasser Usman" → "In 2004, Yasser Usman"
- "was talking of how disturbed Dutt during" → "were talking about how disturbed Dutt was during"
- "He quote these as his motivation" → "He quoted this as his motivation"
- "are in the public domain" → "were in the public domain"
- Add a serial comma after "close friends".
- "but few died before he meet them" → "but a few died before he met them"
- "Usman did several conversation" → "Usman had several conversations"
- "She also discussed about her sibling relationship to Dutt" → "She also discussed her sibling relationship with Dutt"
Critical reception
[edit]- No issues here.
Publication history
[edit]- Since there were only two releases, I would remove the table and change it into simply text.
- Do you want me to added a "Release" section? I think it will be too short, so the table format is the most ideal one. Oh, if you mean keep the "Publication history" section but changed the table to sentences, the problem is same too. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
References
[edit]- Sources are archived.
Progress
[edit]GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |