Talk:Grow Home/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tezero (talk · contribs) 18:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can take this one; I haven't got a whole lot to do today. Tezero (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments:

Not a requirement for GA, but the screenshot's FUR ideally wouldn't have "n.a." fields
Good job with Gameplay; the prose looks a bit clearer than I remember from its PR
Citations and non-iconic quotes in the lead are discouraged, but I'll let you be the judge of them here

I don't usually do this, but I'll just pass this now. Good work! Tezero (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]