Talk:Green Is the Colour

Pink Floyd Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was a past project collaboration.

To-do list:

Fair use

Add fair use rationale to all images and sound samples (all except images already labeled free use).
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).

Articles

Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
See COTM for monthly collabs.

Project building

Add WikiProject Pink Floyd banner {{WPFloyd}} to all appropriate Talk pages.
Personally invite quality editors working on Pink Floyd articles to join the project.

If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Move?

Why is this page moved from Green Is the Colour? Verbs in titles should be upper-case, as in this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hattrem (talk • contribs)

Agreed, it should be moved to Green Is the Colour. --PEJL 06:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

I chaged the genre from Psychedelic rock to Folk rock and Psychedelic folk, like these sourcee say http://www.pinkfloydonline.com/discography/more/ and http://monkeybastardsv20.blogspot.com/2009/01/pink-floyd-lost-years_14.html What the others of wikipedians think? --Italodal (talk) 18:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to state your verifiable references... propose genre changes on the talk page (not declare them)... and wait for discussion and consensus before tampering with the genre field of any article on Wikipedia. Your links all fail WP:RS The Real Libs-speak politely 18:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to change the genre of this song from Psychedelic rock to both Folk rock and Psychedelic Folk, because instrumentation and composition as well music itself is much more resembles the definition of Folk rock and Psychedelic Folk as is "Grantchester Meadows" from Ummagumma. I'm waiting the opinion of the other wikipedians to change it.--Italodal (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well if that were true, then we should change it, and not put in 2 genres. We should always try to use one genre rather than two, especially if the two are almost the same thing. "Psychedelic folk" is not really a recognized genre (even if someone did create an article for it), and "folk rock" ignores the psychedelic element, which is important. I believe the current genre is adequate, but if others feel mention of "folk" should be added, my second choice would be to change it to "psychedelic folk", but NOT use two genres. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]