Jump to content

Talk:Golden Sun: Dark Dawn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGolden Sun: Dark Dawn has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starGolden Sun: Dark Dawn is part of the Golden Sun series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 18, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
October 14, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
May 8, 2017Good article nomineeListed
July 6, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Descendants

[edit]

Remove the statement that it stars the decendents of previous games. That is just speculation at this point and the link in the reference proves nothing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.1.147.160 (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A line directly from a press release at press.nintendo.com is not in any shape, form, or fashion speculation. Arrowned (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the original source link didn't link to that page for whatever reason and that's why I said it. It seems to check out now though. (76.1.147.160 (talk) 05:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Might have been an error with Nintendo's press articles occasionally getting reshuffled or removed. We'll keep an eye on the link in the future in case it happens again. Arrowned (talk) 06:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in mind that they stated the descendants would be in the game, not that all of the original characters would be gone. It's fully possible that the new cast is only one or two generations away, and that the old characters won't be dead yet. The wording in the article seems to contradict that distinct possibility, so if anyone can think of a way to reword it more neutrally, go right ahead. --The F50 Man (talk) 03:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dead reference

[edit]

the first reference link, which is used several times in this article and in the Series article, just links to an empty page at nintendo's website.The Great Morgil (talk) 08:51, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It did link to an E3 page, but I guess they wiped all of those. I don't know where the information would be replicated. Perhaps a link could be found to an archived version? And I'm sure some gaming news sites would have quoted it. 86.177.42.15 (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Japanese E3 page is still up if we need confirmation of the game's title, but we'd be hardpressed to be able to use that for confirmation of its plot, I think. Arrowned (talk) 13:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Release Date

[edit]

the game will hopefully be released at november 29th.

C-Class Assessment.

[edit]

I'm going to get the bad news out of the way first: I believe that the article is still Start-class. I've assessed the article as such not because of too little information, but rather, too much.

You see, higher-class video game articles usually try to condense plot sections to a maximum of 2-4 paragraphs unless absolutely necessary. The plot section here is way, way, way too long. I understand that the game's plot is more complicated than "Isaac had baby, he wants to get the feather but then has to stop Alex from eating the world with darkness", but the article can afford to cut out a lot of less-important details. I'd probably organize it as a paragraph or two for the trip to get the feather, a paragraph about the grave eclipse, and then a paragraph about the Apollo Lens and the post-credits scene.

You don't need to go into massive detail about every character, every city, et cetera. In fact, some things - like Himi - could almost be written out of the plot entirely while losing little encyclopedic value. I strongly advise that this be done. Use the first Golden Sun as an example. The other issue I have is with very odd grammar choices, spread throughout the article. Words like 'propagated' or 'decried' in the development section, for instance - I might talk like that in normal conversation, but most people don't, and we're going for clarity and not poetry. Other sections don't seem much better about this; "But evaluation of this entry are not good as it's predecessors" seems incredibly mechanical compared to "Critics compared the game unfavorably to its predecessors", and that's something I came up with at 3:45 AM so there's probably a way to word that that's better still.

The article has the makings of a GA present, but it's going to need a good shave and a bit of polish before it can manage even C. Emmy Altava 08:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Golden Sun: Dark Dawn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Golden Sun: Dark Dawn/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) 02:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently reviewing this article to see if it qualifies for GA in my assessment. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Result: the article, in my assessment, does indeed pass the criteria for GA status. The article is well written, verifiable, broad in its coverage, neutral, stable, and well illustrated with images. Congratulations haha169 and all other editors who have contributed to this article! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Golden Sun: Dark Dawn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Golden_Sun:_Dark_Dawn&oldid=1207295194"