Talk:Goatskin (material)

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Textile Arts High‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose that the article Morocco leather be merged into this article Goatskin (material). I think that the content of the Morocco leather article can easily be explained within the context of Goatskin (material), which is of reasonable size in which the merging of Morocco leather will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Joe Gatt (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No: Unless morocco leather is the only thing made of goatskin (it's not), the separate articles should remain. 69.255.153.126 (talk) 11:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No: Conversely, unless all morocco leather is made from goatskin (it's not), there should be a separate article for morocco. Also, morocco is a much more popular term in the bookbinding trade than goatskin. GroveGuy (talk) 08:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No: 'Morocco leather' refers to the product originally/primarily obtained from Morocco. It has a specific cultural meaning, referring to the high quality product - not generic goat leather. Drpixie (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No: It should be kept as a separate article. Moroccan Leather has always been a standard of high quality leather, no matter what it was made into. Also, someone needs to correct the usage of Morocco in this article. The leather is from Morocco, therefore when referred to it has historically been called Moroccan Leather. Perhaps because Morocco no longer exists the use of the word "Moroccan" has been lost also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.32.42.236 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 4 October 2013 UTC

I agree with you about the title of Morocco leather. I have created a new section to discuss this on the article's talk page. Jason Quinn (talk) 21:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, per Groveguy, and don't change the title either. Johnbod (talk) 02:30, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

File:Mauritanian bota bag.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mauritanian bota bag.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mauritanian bota bag.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goatskin (material). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130109000405/https://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml74/74026.html to http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml74/74026.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]