Talk:Gettysburg Battlefield

Excelsior Field was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 January 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Gettysburg Battlefield. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Biesecker Woods was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 January 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Gettysburg Battlefield. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Lohr's Hill was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 January 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Gettysburg Battlefield. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Warfield Ridge was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 January 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Gettysburg Battlefield. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Rose Run was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 January 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Gettysburg Battlefield. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Stevens Knoll was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 January 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Gettysburg Battlefield. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Archives

- + 2010-08-05 contents - +

Pennsylvania Top‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Memorials / North America / United States / American Civil War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Cemeteries High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

I am nominating that these articles be merged with the Gettysburg Battlefield article, since they describe minor portions of the battlefield and from what I've read these places were not vital for either army to possess in order to win the battle. Wild Wolf (talk) 22:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have and object to merging in most of Barlow Knoll, but the parts about being a populated place probably need to be left as a stub and hopefully expanded. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been nearly two weeks and no one has objected to this proposal. I will therefore assume that the merge will be ok. Wild Wolf (talk) 19:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal with Baltimore Hill

I am nominating that the Baltimore Hill article be merged with the Gettysburg Battlefield article, since it describes a minor portion of the battlefield and from what I've read this place was not vital for either army to possess in order to win the battle. Wild Wolf (talk) 15:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Third merger proposal

I have proposed that these articles be merged here because this seems like a case of inherited notablility. Wild Wolf (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gettysburg Battlefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel W. Crawford?

The wiki page for General Samuel W. Crawford says ‘After the war, Crawford was prominent in preserving the Gettysburg Battlefield’. There is no mention of Crawford in the quite extensive attributions to other personnel in this context. Valetude (talk) 12:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ziegler's or Zeigler's?

Isn't "Ziegler" the correct spelling as opposed to "Zeigler"used in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OG a.D. 86 (talk • contribs) 09:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gettysburg Battlefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110901180654/http://voicesofgettysburg.com/sarah/ to http://voicesofgettysburg.com/sarah/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nps.gov/archive/gett/getttour/sidebar/letterman.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121020074708/http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/gett/adhi.pdf to http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/gett/adhi.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721060159/http://www.hscl.cr.nps.gov/insidenps/report.asp?STATE=&PARK=GETT&STRUCTURE=entrance_station&SORT=&RECORDNO=755 to http://www.hscl.cr.nps.gov/insidenps/report.asp?STATE=&PARK=GETT&STRUCTURE=entrance_station&SORT=&RECORDNO=755
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nps.gov/archive/gett/gettplan/gmp99archive/histrev.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Gettysburg National Battlefield" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gettysburg National Battlefield. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 2#Gettysburg National Battlefield until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]