Talk:German Orthographic Conference of 1901

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

{{Improve}} notice

The following enormous cleanup message was added in 2018:

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: "The conference results removed numerous existing variant forms." -- while that is correct (e.g. regarding -ieren/-iren, daß/dass), it's also misleading and lacking information as numerous existing variant forms still existed after the conference. It would be good to point out, when more forms got removed (unofficially by Buchdruckerduden 1903; officially by new regional spelling rules, e.g. in Prussia 1907 and 1908; by other Duden editions? Please help improve this article if you can.

Given that this is nearly as long as the article itself, I'm moving it here to preserve it and encourage discussion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]