Talk:Georgina Kennard

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 17 August 2020, see discussion.
keep, 13 August 2016, see discussion.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

I was so heavily struck by the seeming irrelevance of this woman as to enter it under AfD, only to find it had already been voted as 'keep' in 2016. Is there anything she did in particular that ought to be added here, because I could find virtually nothing about her apart from what the article currently indicates- i.e. 'well-connected' 'distant cousin of the Queen' 'godmother of Prince Andrew'- and which seems bewilderingly little to justify her having an article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.77.254 (talk) 20:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; why on EARTH does this woman have an article? Per NOTGENEALOGY and the guidelines stating notable relatives do not confer notability, one is entirely perplexed by this article, which is bereft of any meaningful content whatsoever! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.239.162 (talk) 02:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]