Talk:George Johnstone Stoney

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Ireland C‑class Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stoney scale

I've presented Stoney quantities here simply as mathematical constructs. They have no significance for scientific theory, whereas Planck quantities conventionally do have physical significance. I don't see any other way to address the issue since there is almost no scientific literature dedicated to the Stoney scale and its physical significance, excepting of course Weyl's failed theory.Lucretius 05:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistencies on electron history

Wikipedia says in article on J. J. Thomson that Johnstone Stoney proposed the word "electron" in 1894 and Thomson announced his results in 1897. But in the article on Johnstone Stoney says the name came in 1891 and Thomson discovered the particle in 1905. Something is very uncoordinated here. -LEA

I fixed this according to physics historian Max Jammer's 1957 book Concepts of Force. The correct date is 1874. Later: --Sadi Carnot 17:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stoney first used the term electron in 1891 in his paper in the Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society, vol. IV, on page 583. StarryGrandma (talk) 03:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reverting edits by 123.255.63.50

I'm reverting recent edits by 123.255.63.50, including nonsense like this (italics mine):

There are two reasons why Stoney units are no more than mathematical constructs. One is that even now, G is known to no more than about 1 part in 7000. The other is that the state of technology places a practical lower limit to how small a length can be measured. If the Stoney length is the minimum length, then either a body's electromagnetic radius or its half gravitational radius is a physical impossibility, since one of these must be smaller than the Stoney length. If the Planck length is the minimum length, then either a body's reduced Compton wavelength or its half gravitational radius is a physical impossibility, since one of these must be smaller than the Planck length. Hence neither the Stoney length nor the Planck length can be "the" minimum length.

The first sentence is nonsense - all units are just mathematical constructs (Nature doesn't have units). The last sentence is a non-sequitur and it does not reflect mainstream opinion, according to which there is a minimum length enforced by nature - the favoured candidate is the Planck length. Lucretius (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling Errors

I found some spellings errors, so I hope u don't mind that I took the liberty of changing them! I noticed them as I was reading over the article, an they distracted me from the meaning. Besides we should all try to make sure Wikipedia articles always have correct grammar and spelling :3

If you have any concerns please vist my UserPage (talk) 13:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-Irish

It is not a nationality, it is a class, see the http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Ireland-related_articles and http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ireland#Anglo_Irish. Sheodred (talk) 11:26, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maternal Grandfather of Alan Turing

This according to Hodges Turing bio. Probably worth mentioning in article?--Jrm2007 (talk) 15:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, misremembered: Grandfather's second cousin. Not a close relative at all but one that Turing's mother admired nonetheless.--Jrm2007 (talk) 14:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Johnstone Stoney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150712013755/https://www.offalyhistory.com/reading-resources/history/famous-offaly-people/george-johnstone-stoney-1826-1911 to https://www.offalyhistory.com/reading-resources/history/famous-offaly-people/george-johnstone-stoney-1826-1911

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]