Talk:George Jeffreys, 1st Baron Jeffreys

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buckinghamshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lord Chief Justice

Untitled

I have rearranged the chronology slightly to show that Jeffreys acceded to this position before the trial of Algernon Sidney (see the Rye House Plot article) and to simplify the account of his appointments by James II. As he was already a Privy Councillor, this fact doesn't need to be repeated. Richard Lugg (talk) 21:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Religion

I have changed this detail in the Infobox from the vague Protestant to Anglicanism. As result of various laws passed in Charles II's reign, non-Anglican protestants - known as Nonconformists - could not become judges.Cloptonson (talk) 13:11, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Death and Burial

I have added explanation for the removal of the remains of St Mary Aldermanbury Church to the United States - see also article on the church - and deleted the editor-added "Why?"Cloptonson (talk) 13:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:George Jeffreys, 1st Baron Jeffreys/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

I have just read this article, and am still unsure of whether I should laugh or cry.

There are so many points I can raise, I just don't think there are enough words to articulate them all.

To start with, the article is appalingly badly written. It provides no support for any of it's comments, which is perhaps not that supprising when they are read. Although I would hazzard a guess and say that Macaulay and Oates provided the staple background! It's bias is so prevelant it detracts from the article and in large parts is either incorrect or misleading. I am a historian, someone whose job it is to actually study historical events and discuss them, this has clearly been written by someone with no understanding of the basic principles of modern historiography.

In summary, if my opinions haven't been that well constructed, this article, if one can indeed call it that, isn't worth the time it take to read! The only thing that upsets me more, is that I will never be able to recover the time it took me to read! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.44.97 (talk • contribs)

Last edited at 13:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 16:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)