Talk:George Armstrong (ice hockey)/GA1
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 23:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Resolute
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
Check for WP:BLP:
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google.)
![]() Check for WP:RS: Cross-checked with other FAs: Calgary Flames, Calgary Hitmen, Calgary Stampede, Theoren Fleury, Terry Fox, Grey Cup, Paul Henderson, Jarome Iginla, Lanny McDonald, Tiny Thompson
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() Cross-checked with other FAs: Calgary Flames, Calgary Hitmen, Calgary Stampede, Theoren Fleury, Terry Fox, Grey Cup, Paul Henderson, Jarome Iginla, Lanny McDonald, Tiny Thompson
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (PD)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. Thanks, Resolute, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Connormah (talk) 22:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.