Jump to content

Talk:Geology of solar terrestrial planets

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleGeology of solar terrestrial planets was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 10, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 20, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 5, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Article under massive construction

[edit]

the following page is currently under MASSIVE CONSTRUCTION. please discuss before making any changes. Thanks, Sushant gupta 10:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

Good work to this article. Everything is well referenced, broad, factually accurate, neutral. This article certainly taught me a lot about space. Pass. Mitchcontribs 13:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planetary Geology → Merge?

[edit]

This article is much better than Planetary geology. However, it seems that the planetary geology article is about the field, while this article describes the facts. Should Planetary Geology be merged into this article and become a redirect? At very least, think a wikilink between the two should be in order. Awickert (talk) 04:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Geology of solar terrestrial planets/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

GA Sweeps: On Hold

[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to determine if the article should remain a Good article. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are several issues that need to be addressed. I have already made minor corrections to the article, but have included issues below that I believe need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA.

Needs inline citations:

  1. "The four inner or terrestrial planets have dense, rocky compositions, few or no moons, and no ring systems. They are composed largely of minerals with high melting points, such as the silicates which form their solid crusts and semi-liquid mantles, and metals such as iron and nickel, which form their cores."
  2. "...they probably formed by widespread volcanism early in mercurian history."
  3. "According to the data of the altimeters of the Pioneer, nearly 51% of the surface is found located within 500 metres (1,640 ft) of the median radius of 6,052 km (3760 mi); only 2% of the surface is located at greater elevations than 2 kilometres (1 mi) from the median radius."
  4. "Venus shows no evidence of active plate tectonics."
  5. "There is debatable evidence of active tectonics in the planet's distant past; however, events taking place since then (such as the plausible and generally accepted hypothesis that the Venusian lithosphere has thickened greatly over the course of several hundred million years) has made constraining the course of its geologic record difficult."
  6. "This research has led to the fairly well accepted hypothesis that Venus has undergone an essentially complete volcanic resurfacing at least once in its distant past, with the last event taking place approximately within the range of estimated surface ages."
  7. "In part, this is because Venus's dense atmosphere burns up smaller meteorites before they hit the surface. The Venera and Magellan data agree: there are very few impact craters with a diameter less than 30 kilometres (19 mi), and data from Magellan show an absence of any craters less than 2 kilometres (1 mi) in diameter."
  8. "Much of Venus' surface appears to have been shaped by volcanic activity."
  9. "Deserts cover about 20% of the total land area."
  10. "The geological history of Earth can be broadly classified into two periods namely:"
  11. "The geological history of Mars can be broadly classified into many epochs, but the following are the three major ones:"
  12. "It is made of thousands of rocky planetesimals from 1,000 kilometres (621 mi) to a few meters across."

Other issues:

  1. This isn't required for GA, but I tagged a few images to be moved over to Wikimedia Commons. If you have an account, consider moving the images over so that other language Wikipedias can use them as well.
  2. There are multiple external links, see if some can be removed. Check to see if some of the sites are duplicates or cover the same information. Consider using some of them for citing the above statements.
  3. There are various dead links in the articles that need to be fixed (see here). Use the Internet Archive to fix the links or replace them with new sources if possible.

This article was an interesting read with a handful of great free images. If the above issue is addressed, I believe the article can remain a GA. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed, one may be given. If no progress is made, the article may be delisted, which then can later be renominated at WP:GAN. I will contact the main contributors of the article and its related WikiProjects to ease the workload. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps: Delisted

[edit]

Unfortunately, since none of the issues were fixed, I have regrettably delisted the article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. If the remaining issues are fixed, consider renominating the article at WP:GAN. With a little work, especially with a collaboration among the multiple WikiProjects, it should have no problems getting back up to GA status. If you disagree with this review, you can seek an alternate opinion at Good article reassessment. If you have any questions let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 19:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geology of solar terrestrial planets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Geology of solar terrestrial planets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Geology_of_solar_terrestrial_planets&oldid=1202252970"