Talk:Fundal height

Fundal height graph

I just deleted the graph that correlated gestational age and fundal height. It was suggesting that the normal fundal height was about 35cm at 40 weeks gestation, which is wrong according to Uptodate, William's Obstetrics, and what was already written on this article. --Africantearoa (talk) 05:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Postpartum?

Would be good to cover what happens to Fundal height postpartum, as in that it falls Ana4eva (talk) 11:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Everyday explanation?

This article does not answer the everyman question 'What is fundal height?', which should offer some context of the baby's actual height or other familiar metric. Too techy.

Retarget the Fundus redirect?

I hope I have enough energy to follow-though on this, but redirecting here to Fundal height might be a better destination for the 2/2018 Fundus conversion from stub article to redirect, rather than its current section redirect to a one- or two-line mention in the second section of Uterus. Other considerations:

Which article to link to in the Template:Female reproductive system, or to remove the link.
If the redirect changes targets, the bolding of "fundus" in Uterus' second section/first after intro should be removed. I mean, I like seeing topics bolded for redirects and have made a few myself, but this one's at an awkward place for it anyway, since it barely gets mentioned in a list of other things.
Please post this wherever/cc this to whomever because the likelihood of my finishing this is dropping rapidly after a ceramic-type plumbing failure (the bathroom's! not mine! but in the bathroom!) in the middle of typing this. Oof.

Thanks! Geekdiva (talk) 22:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]