Talk:Fritz the Cat/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment

1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

   • 

2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

   • 

3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

   • 

4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.

   • 

5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

   • 

No obvious problems found when checking against the quick fail criteria, moving on the substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • Well written. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (MoS):

   • Conforms with MoS sufficiently. I de-wikilinked Robin Hood as this goes to the folk hero, which doesn't seem right. If I got this wrong, please re-link. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • All on-line references are live. References that I have been able to check are OK. Assume GF for the print sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • I don't think we can categorize ref #9 [1]. It looks like a variety of wiki. On further investigation it appears that Markstein is an authority on comics and graphic novels, so OK for the statement it supports. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

   c (OR):

   • No evidence of OR. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • OK, I believe this meets the Good Article criteria so, I am passing it to GA status. Congratulations.