Jump to content

Talk:French destroyer Tartu (1931)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on French destroyer Tartu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:French destroyer Tartu (1931)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 22:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


On my list. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Should "the 5th Demi-Brigade of Mountain Infantry (5e Demi-Brigade de Chasseurs alpins)" have an upper case A in "alpins"?
    • Not according to French-language sources that I used for other French DD articles
  • "The 5th Scout Division returned to Toulon on 27 May in anticipation of the Italians joining the war as the Mediterranean Fleet was prepared to attack them." This makes it sound as if the Italians were joining the war because the Mediterranean Fleet was prepared to attack them.
  • "After they declared war on 10 June" Could we specify "they"?
  • "Damage assessments afterward revealed that little damage had been inflicted despite expending over 1,600 rounds of all calibers" Damage to the Italian MASs, the oil tanks, or Vado Ligure generally.
  • "After the French surrender on 22 June, the Royal Navy attacked the ships in Mers-el-Kébir, French Algeria, on 3 July to prevent them from being turned over to the Germans; Tartu was one of the ships that rendezvoused with the ships from Oran, French Algeria, and escorted them to Toulon." I am struggling to spot the connection, if any, between the two parts of this sentence; and the relevance, if any, of the first part. Consider trimming and/or explaining a little further.
See how it reads now. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:06, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That all looks good. I am passing now, but, could you have a look at my comment above in green, which you seem to have overlooked. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 09:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed