This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I strongly suggest that the left hand side images be moved to a gallery section. At the moment, the text is being "squeezed" too much and the layout is non-standard. – ukexpat (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My feeling is that the images are an integral part of this article about an historic site. I will try to weave references to the images into the text more effectively, though. This article was originally set up to describe a NRHP site, so I am "stuck" with the extremely long NRHP template. If it's important, could someone let me know where the "standard" WP layout is described? Pgrig (talk) 13:41, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think I can move at least three of the photos into a Gallery, and will do this soon. This will help make it less cluttered....Pgrig (talk) 13:45, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In line with the way other fort articles have developed, I'm proposing that the Fort Banks Mortar Battery article be merged into this one, especially as the fort had only the one battery originally (split into two later). Comments are welcome. RobDuch (talk) 02:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]