Talk:For Tonight We Might Die

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the For Tonight We Might Die article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expanded version of the page

Expanded version of the page.

Hopefully it can now exist as its own separate article, and other editors can hopefully build on this going forward into the future.

69.50.70.9 (talk) 03:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this page won't get deleted ! 69.50.70.9 (talk) 04:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why would it be? It's a valid article with sufficient content. The only reason it was redirected was because it looked like this. Alex|The|Whovian^? 04:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'm glad you think it can exist. 69.50.70.9 (talk) 04:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Capaldi 's part in show more then cameo

The part Peter has in the show is more then a cameo appearance. His part is close to 10 minutes if not longer (Appears at 35:12 and leaves at 44:45), and his name is in the credits. Tardis is also shown several times coming and leaving. --Ecto~enwiki (talk) 04:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, good point, took out the word cameo and changed it to guest appearance. 69.50.70.9 (talk) 04:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ecto~enwiki does that look better now? 69.50.70.9 (talk) 04:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, however I have not proofed the whole article, spending too much time re-watching the show LOL --Ecto~enwiki (talk) 04:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I gotta get back to that also LOL. Cheers mate, 69.50.70.9 (talk) 04:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can the next one be an article

Good job so far on the plot summary guys, especially AlexTheWhovian.

Quick question, can someone make the next one an article, also, "The Coach with the Dragon Tattoo" ?

Would that be ripe to be its own page?

69.50.70.9 (talk) 04:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Since this article is done and dusted (for the most part), a page for episode 2 seems necessary and should be created before the release of episode 3 - to avoid creating a backlog. Plus the episode was released 4 days ago now so it needs to exist sooner rather than later.86.177.102.193 (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah definitely agree with that guy. Especially as the show seems to be getting more press. 69.50.70.9 (talk) 23:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, makes sense, as long as there's enough information to initially add to it. Alex|The|Whovian^? 00:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google News shows 10 pages of hits. 69.50.70.9 (talk) 01:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated. It needs a written-from-scratch plot, production and reception information to start from to become a valid article. If you want to create an article, then that's up to you. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:21, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully someone will do that, at least maybe before the next episode. 69.50.70.9 (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]