Talk:FeardotCom

Canada: Quebec / Montreal / Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Film: British / Canadian / German / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Luxembourg Low‑importance

	Luxembourg portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The real fear.com

Fear.com exists, but it's related to keeping your phone records private. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.172.165 (talk • contribs)

One can presume that the producers of the movie originally wanted to make the fictional website in the movie (and the real one about the movie) at fear.com, but were stymied by not owning it (and the real owners would likely want a large amount to sell such a good name), so they instead put it at the bizarrely redundant feardotcom.com. *Dan T.* 20:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that specifically the AMERICAN version of the ring (based on the japanese ringu) came out after this movie. This movie is a blatant ripoff of ringu changing only the delivery method of the death curse. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.238.49.65 (talk) 08:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This film has NOTHING to do with the Ringu series of films, nor the Ju-On films. It's a completely different story and unrelated to any film it has supposedly ripped off. Quite the contrary, it's a remake of horror.com (see below). If you consider a remake to be ripped off then FearDotCom ripped off Horror.Com which ripped off Kairo. If you are going to post opinion of no help to the general well-being of the article; you may be better served doing your research more thoroughly. At least that way you don't look as bad to those who are knowledgeable in the area. Lostinlodos (talk) 05:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who ripped off/re-made/imitated/tributed whom is a secondary issue. What is beyond a doubt is that the film lacks originality. Further, that the story line and basic principle of the movie is that of the ring. Only in a very superficial understanding is it possible to overlook this fact. (Irrespective of the cause for this similarity.)

94.220.253.72 (talk) 05:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The death curse (呪怨, Ju-On, Curse of Death) is a common theme across East-Asian film, be it Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Thailandish, .... along with Yōkai (妖怪, 요괴, Spirit Monsters) it is a base staple in all aspects of many Asian cultures; and is abundant in film, literature, religion, mythology, and ritual. Lostinlodos (talk) 23:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Missing links between films

While this film is related to the "Kairo universe" in storyline ways, it's a near-exact remake of Horror.com, a Chinese film. That in turn was a based on Kairo.
Story Time line

Kairo 2001
Horror.com 2001
FearDotCom (FearDotCom.Com) 2002
Pulse 2006

Lostinlodos (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well i have not watched this but my sisters said that it was bad so well what will happen to me lol yea write nothing come get vanessa and heather and ayaan what is going to happen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.33.149 (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion and Themes

This article could have a lot more information added to it. For starters there is no information on the film's production and release and there needs to be more reviews from notable critics added to the reception section. Also shouldn't some of the film's themes be mentioned in the article?--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missing catagory?

should this be in the dark web catagory? other films themed around it are counted. I might be missing something but i dont know. 96.55.168.38 (talk) 06:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution outside the US

Sorry, but I need to settle this once and for all: who controls the distribution rights to this film outside of the US, is it Columbia-TriStar, Warner Bros./Franchise (?), MDP themselves, GAGA/HUMAX or all of the above… My opinion is that MDP handled sales themselves since TriPictures held the Spanish distribution rights, CT in the rest of the world and WB in the states. VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 03:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions are original research and are forbidden on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is based on what reliable sources say. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]