Talk:Fajr-3 (disambiguation)
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 8 October 2024
[edit]
 | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
– Per page views, specifically between the current de facto primary topic and Fajr-3 (missile), there is WP:NOPRIMARY. Steel1943 (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the artillery rocket has 5,250 views but the missile has 3,920 and the aircraft has 22. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: I think I get what you mean on the "weak" there, given the specific page view amounts and I was half considering not posting this move request at all. I probably should have mentioned this in my nomination statement, but I think the potential lack of inherent clarity of differentiating between an "artillery rocket" and a "missile" by their names alone, to most readers, is the icing on the cake there. If there's a clear difference between the terms, I'm not seeing it, and it is still making me think there should be a merge discussion (though I am probably wrong regarding the merge.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, had the missile had 5,000 it wouldn't have been weak but I still don't think the ratios are enough for a primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: I think I get what you mean on the "weak" there, given the specific page view amounts and I was half considering not posting this move request at all. I probably should have mentioned this in my nomination statement, but I think the potential lack of inherent clarity of differentiating between an "artillery rocket" and a "missile" by their names alone, to most readers, is the icing on the cake there. If there's a clear difference between the terms, I'm not seeing it, and it is still making me think there should be a merge discussion (though I am probably wrong regarding the merge.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)