Talk:Exit Through the Kwik-E-Mart

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Exit Through the Kwik-E-Mart article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Exit Through the Kwik-E-Mart has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 26, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

The Simpsons Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SimpsonsWikipedia:WikiProject The SimpsonsTemplate:WikiProject The SimpsonsThe Simpsons articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

edit

Collaboration: Featured topic Drive
Copyedit:
Merge:
Cleanup: Ralph Wiggum, Milhouse Van Houten
Shorten plot synopsis:
Free-use images: Jon Vitti, Pamela Hayden, Greg Daniels, Ian Maxtone-Graham, Jim Reardon, Alf Clausen
Reference: Bongo Comics Group, The Heartbroke Kid, World of Springfield
Expand: The Simpsons Theme, Bongo Comics, Mark Kirkland, Jim Reardon, The Simpsons: Tapped Out
Stubs: Neil Affleck, Bob Anderson (director), Wes Archer, J. Stewart Burns More...

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Exit Through the Kwik-E-Mart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TRLIJC19 (talk · contribs) 15:54, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

General
- No disambiguation links, follows WP:TV-NAME, the article is 1503 words (readable prose size).

Infobox
- Can you reference the production code?
  - Sure, done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
- No issues; follows WP:TVLEAD well.

Plot
- No issues; follows WP:TVPLOT well, is a good size at 462 words, and the prose is clear and concise, with no typographical errors.

Production
- WP:SURNAME says that after a person's full name is given, they should be referred to by their surname throughout the rest of the article. That said, "Shepard Fairey", "Ron English", "Kenny Scharf", and "Robbie Conal" are repeated in full in this section.
  - Fixed! Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reception
- No issues; follows WP:TVRECEPTION well, gives a broad analysis of the episode, and does not apply undue weight to any individual review(er).

References
- All sources checked; no plagiarism or copyright concerns.
- The citations are missing publishers.
  - Per WP:CITEHOW, that information is not needed. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - (talk page stalker) You still can have if you'd like, but, its not required, though. TBran dl ey 14:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Coinciding with the above, TV by the Numbers is a work of Zap2it, and should be italicized.
  - TV by the Numbers is a website so it shouldn't be italicized. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, very well put-together article. I am placing this on hold for the minor issues to be addressed. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

With everything having been addressed, this article now fulfills the good article criteria, and is being promoted. Good job to the nominator and other significant contributors. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ending credits

according to the description on this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZwJ3BZ6gig the ending credits sequence of this video was made by him. I think it should be mentioned. 209.112.184.130 (talk) 00:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]