Talk:Euston Arch

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Mid‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Dan Cruickshank

Can anyone add anything about Dan Cruickshank's work to find the "rubble", as seen on the BBC's One Foot in the Past? Andy Mabbett 12:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC) I remember seeing the programme. So it was not made up. Also why has the Euston Arch Trust web page been deleted? I wanted to follow the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.109.49 (talk) 20:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"First attempt to demolish the arch"

In the reference given for the subsection Euston Arch#First attempt, Stamp talks first about 'removal' of the Arch, but the rest of the paragraph makes clear he means relocation, not demolition. I intend to correct this, which will require changing the headings beyond this paragraph. I think the existing heading structure could do with revising anyway — at present the 'History' section covers the 19th century only and i'm not sure three levels of headings are necessary as the article isn't all that long. Qwfp (talk) 13:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Euston Arch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071124183646/http://www.ucl.ac.uk:80/sts/cain/projects/euston_grove/index.htm to http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/cain/projects/euston_grove/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Euston Arch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071101082227/http://www.apollo-magazine.com/189416/steam-ahead.thtml to http://www.apollo-magazine.com/189416/steam-ahead.thtml
Added {{dead link}} tag to https://www.waterscape.com/features-and-articles/news/2431/unlocking-the-secret-of-the-euston-arch-stones
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eustonarch.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Euston Arch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140728184642/http://golondon.about.com/od/Victoria-Line-Tile-Motifs/ss/Euston.htm to http://golondon.about.com/od/Victoria-Line-Tile-Motifs/ss/Euston.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Hayes - not Transport Secretary as claimed

John Hayes was described as "McLoughlin's successor as Transport Secretary", but this was not accurate. Patrick McLoughlin was succeeded as Secretary of State for Transport by Chris Grayling and Hayes has never held the post. However Hayes had two spells as a Minister of State for Transport (ie a ministerial position under the Secretary of State), and was serving in this office and the time of the November 2016 statement mentioned in the article. I have therefore modified the article to accurately reflect this. Dunarc (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph

It would be useful if possible to get a photograph from a similar angle as c:File:Euston Arch.jpg showing what now occupies the space. McPhail (talk) 13:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]