Talk:Espérance Sportive de Tunis/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Mejri Fares (talk · contribs) 11:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Phlsph7 (talk · contribs) 10:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mejri Fares and thanks for all your improvements to this article. However, despite the improvements, the article fails criterion 2b since there are too many unreferenced paragraphs. Examples are the paragraphs starting with "Under Zouiten's tenure, which lasts more than three decades", "Football emerged in the Regency of Tunis in the early 1900s", "However, the presence of a French president,", and "With these players, the club won the Tunisian Cup in 2008 and 2011". According to criterion 2b, these and similar passages require inline citations "no later than the end of the paragraph". I suggest that you add all the relevant references before a renomination.

A few other observations

WP:EARWIG detects one potential copyvio but this is not a problem because the other page copied from Wikipedia with proper attribution
there are various punctuation errors, like
- scorer, scoring 127 goals .Tunisian space should be after the period, not before it
- been president of the club since 2007 , and no space before the comma
- a tournament where Espérance had hoped to make a stronger impact missing period at the end of the sentence
Under Zouiten's tenure, which lasts more than three decades should this be past tense?
Since 2022, the club launched Taraji+ replace "Since" with "In"
The latter opts for Italian-style defensive principles. should this be past tense?
which marked a pinnacle in the history of Espérance replace "which" with "This" because it is a new sentence
Facebook and Youtube are used as sourcs at various points. I suggest replacing them with better sources per WP:RSP.

Phlsph7 (talk) 10:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.