Jump to content

Talk:Ernesto Samper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

unbalanced

[edit]

besides proper citations, the article needs a balance between the bad things he did and the good ones whiel trying to maintain a W:NPOV and also add some other activities he might have done. Early years? studies? other public offices held?. --F3rn4nd0 21:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree (despite not being a "fan" of the guy myself in any way, shape or form), though I currently am not in the best position to assist in this matter. The article needs sources, more biographical information, and more data about the rest of his administration, both good and bad (there's plenty in both categories, I'm sure). Juancarlos2004 04:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article sounds as if it was written by the American CIA. Samper had a long history of favoring liberalization of Colombia's drug laws, a position which had a lot of popular support. This article completely omits the story of how he was shot at the airport in 1989 by the Medellin cartel -- sources differ as to whether he was the intended victim or not.
In any case, the American government was extremely unhappy with him because he didn't play ball with them... It is certainly possible that the CIA cooked up this campaign finance thing... who knows? Certainly the cocaine and marijuana businesses are big parts of the Colombian economy, and naturally the people involved in the business will try to support candidates whose policies they think will be in their favor.
But the reality is that Jesse Helms put a hold on US foreign aid because he didn't feel Samper was cooperative enough, and this was used as a tool to turn the Colombian people against him.
There is quite a lot of sourced information about him... A good starting place is "The bullet or the bribe: taking down Colombia's Cali drug cartel" By Ron Chepesiuk.
I do have a bit of bias -- his wife is my cousin.
--cs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.97.127 (talk) 10:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the "unbalanced" template from 2010, having myself added a fair amount of "balancing" material. The article should be in better shape for that. Dhtwiki (talk) 05:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subjects to include

[edit]
  • Werner Mauss affair

--F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 15:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This picture needs to go

[edit]

I'm not too familiar with Samper, but it doesn't seem like I would be a big fan of his. The picture on his article looks silly and out of place though. It would be like having (http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/S/H/bush_turkey.jpg) for George W. Bush.--Shikata Ganai (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image File:NAM Identificador.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ernesto Samper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ernesto Samper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]