Talk:Enemy Zero

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (3 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (12 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Human vessel?

Can someone clarify what a "human vessel" is?

In the context, I would say a spaceship built and crewed by humans. A common usage in the SF genre, but I'll change the article to say "spaceship" rather than "vessel". --Bth 09:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Development

I find the first paragraph highly doubtful - do you have any sources to back up this story? SB

Your post isn't dated, so I'm not sure what you're talking about... But at this moment, the only true part of that paragraph is the story about Eno morphing the Playstation logo into the Saturn logo at a Sony press conference. The rest is false. Enemy Zero was never developed for the Playstation; Real Sound: Kaze no Regret was the game originally developed for the Playstation that then became a Saturn exclusive. And Sony never imposed any content restrictions on WARP. I'm going to edit that section now to remove the false statements.--Martin IIIa (talk) 14:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting my own post: Enemy Zero was originally developed for the Playstation. One of Eno's statements in an interview sounded like it was saying the contrary, but I later found another interview where he explicitly says he had started work on it for the Playstation, and is asked about how he re-worked the game for the Saturn.--Martin IIIa (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Enemy Zero. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.elecplay.com/review_1908.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Enemy Zero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121208154024/http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=0&cId=3169166 to http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=0&cId=3169166
Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.elecplay.com/review_1908.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing

Non-notable soundtracks: Unless the soundtrack or music is the subject of independent commentary (apart from the game): put it in Development rather than its own section, do not include tracklists

It's listed right in WP:GAMECRUFT. The score of the game is not notable enough to have track by track listings. Notability is not derived so it doesn't matter how notable the composer is. This is a very straight forward issue. Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While I don't hold a strong opinion either way on the issue, it's unclear why you bothered to post arguments that Scottandrewhutchins' preceding edit summary had already negated. Scott said he considers the album notable, so whether he is right or wrong on that count, simply replying that it's not notable is not persuasive. And his suggestion to move the content to a separate article clearly moves the issue beyond the scope of WP:GAMECRUFT.--Martin IIIa (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack

@Scottandrewhutchins: WP:VGSCOPE states that unless a soundtrack is "the subject of independent commentary (apart from the game)" do not include track lists or soundtrack cover art, and put the content in the Development section. In the past I tried to do this, as have others, but you have repeatedly reintroduced this content. This is unusual for video game articles, so I'm starting a discussion. I would like to merge the music section into the Development section, and remove the tracklist and cover art. Infobox will be retained. If you take issue with this, please provide sources that show the soundtrack is subject to independent commentary. Otherwise, I will do this in a few days. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 18:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]