Talk:Emperor Daowu of Northern Wei

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

道武帝.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research and speculation?

This article presents two different accounts of Tuoba Gui's early life, but apart from insufficient citations, the analysis that follows them comes across as original research, particularly the bullet points under "Alternate version" that analyzes the plausibility of either. These bullet pointed explanations are written more like an individual is making conversation, like in a Reddit post, and less so with an encyclopedic voice. They also contain so much speculation with no citations to professional sources for the speculation.

As well, the second account is stated to be from the Book of Jin and Book of Song, but the first account is simply stated as "the official accounts". The article refers again to the first account as "the official version" or "official accounts" in other places, and it is never clear what is even the title of the source being so designated as "official". If the bullet points cannot be sourced, I can only recommend that we remove them from the article. Sol Pacificus (talk) 08:07, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]