Talk:Emilie Autumn/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Referenced well, sources appear RS in context, no evidence of OR
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Detailed with unnecessary trivia
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Licensed, tagged and captioned.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Just one minor point above to address. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying, I am happy to pass this as a GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thank you for taking the time to review. Her father became a run-away; I've gone ahead and clarified that in the article. Kaguya-chan (talk) 00:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)