Talk:Elvina Beck

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Response to COI tag on Feb 20th 2020

RESPONSE FROM PRIMARY CONTRIBUTOR (@ FEB 20th 2020) TO COI TAG

I'm the "major contributor" to this page and have no "close connection" to the subject as defined by the COI regulations published on Wikipedia. Could the person who posted the COI template please specify to this Talk page (as required when posting a COI tag) on what grounds he or she posted, so I can answer to it? Thanks. All the best. Zedembee (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FURTHER NOTE FROM PRIMARY CONTRIBUTOR (@ FEB 20th 2020)

Just to confirm beyond all doubt:

I have never received any money, consideration or quid pro quo of any kind from the subject or any subsidiary or representative of the subject
My contributions to this piece were written without any kind of consultation with the subject and were instead sourced from the external publications listed extensively in References
There is no external relationship between myself and the subject that might be advanced by my contributions to this article, or that might influence the scope, quality or reliability of the information included in my contributions.

Hope this clarifies and please don't post a COI tag without justification, it simply creates work for me. Cheers:Zedembee (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know. There are a lot of those who just slap templates onto articles w/o any real explanation and never revisit, hoping someone else fixes it all for them. The fact you reverted it and they did not put it back up means they are not even keeping track of what they are doing. I think the article is fine myself but be aware of Neutral Point of View and make sure it does not look too much like a "puff piece" even if you had no intention of doing so. (Also, I also gave you one of those standard welcome greetings on your talk page). Someone in SoCal Area (talk) 23:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Earlier today I grouched a bit on my User talk page about this, before seeing the response from you above. Great note on maintaining neutrality, thanks; I will keep that in mind.Zedembee (talk) 23:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I looked at the references and you included many independent sources in both articles which is a big plus. I don't see why anyone should have a problem here. Someone in SoCal Area (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated. Wishing you good health and toilet paper. Zedembee (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]