Talk:Elevator:2010

A question of power— Critiques?

There is a efficiency problem with beamed power. This isn't a problem with small elevator throughput. But for serious throughput, in the range of what would be needed for a power satellite construction project, it is.

Power satellites need in the range of a million tonnes per year, in rough numbers 100t/hr. A kg takes close to 15 kWh to lift it to GEO.

A mechanical (moving cable) elevator lifting a kg/hr would take 15kW to drive it. An elevator lifting 1 t/hr would take 15 MW. 100 t/hr would need 1.5 GW.

At ten percent efficient, the laser input power would be 15 GW.

8 GW input seems to be enough to support a 100 t/hr laser ablation propulsion transport system.

Comments?

Keith Henson (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How does this contribute to the article? Darrenaustralia (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External link to Elevator2010.org

This link only contains advertising. There is no useful information related to the article at all. Can it be removed? Darrenaustralia (talk) 06:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elevator:2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elevator:2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.spaceward.org/elevator2010-ts
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091018103923/http://www.lasermotive.com/blog/ to http://www.lasermotive.com/blog/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]