Talk:Dysoxylum

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sections 'Cultural connections' and 'Ecological connections'

@Tom Radulovich: I see the subject sections as being quite useless in a page that deals with a genus - we can see that the information contained within both sections apply to selected species, thus they are far more useful in the pages of the child taxa. I'm proposing to delete both sections and where possible add the content in the relevant species' pages. What is your view?

Also, I'm preparing to rewrite the 'Species' section as 'Taxonomy', and make 'Species' a sub-heading for the list. Junglenut |Talk 10:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - most of the species mentioned are no longer in this genus, so it's just confusing to keep that content here. The section about how many species are native to which regions is now inaccurate; we should either be revise or delete it. Tom Radulovich (talk) 16:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]