Talk:Dynamic inconsistency

current assessment grades are appropriate: class=start: importance=low. Many improvements to be made, lack of citing and sources a key problem. Jockab 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jockab (talk • contribs) 01:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hcg25: I would like to extend this article a bit. There seem to be a few technical mistakes (e.g. time inconsistency does not require changing preferences, hyperbolic discounting is not a clear-cut example of time inconsistency), and a small model with a graph might be useful. Is anyone else working on this article at the moment?

Go for it! But please provide references if you can. Martin 21:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to how time inconsistency is used specifically in the area of behavioral economics, I think you are mistaken about the technical mistakes, but still, go ahead, and if you are right, it will stick. An example model with a graph would really be great, by the way. Cheers, HalfDome 12:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for both of your encouragement! Unfortunately, I don't have much time for another two weeks, will get started after that. --Hcg25 10:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dynamic inconsistency. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://economics.cornell.edu/CAE/Project.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dynamic inconsistency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Inconsistenza temporale" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Inconsistenza temporale and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 13#Inconsistenza temporale until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 02:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]