Talk:Dwarf galaxy problem

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

‹See TfM›

Physics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed unreferenced tag

I added a ref for the Local Group and Milky Way dwarf satellites to the existing one for the Milky Way dwarf satellites predicted from dark matter simulation, and compared the two to show the problem (11 observed as opposed to 500 predicted for the Milky Way). So the unreferenced tag, whilst previously partly justified, is now unnecessary in my POV and I removed it. I also added a wikilink to this page, and these refs, from Dark Matter which also mentions the lack of dwarf galaxies compared to DM predictions. Puzl bustr (talk) 14:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolution

The resolution, to this conundrum, could be a question of (simulation) resolution -- if you combine the counts, of Globular Clusters, with Dwarf Galaxies, you quickly reach numbers (100s), completely consistent, with said simulations. So, perhaps the sims are currently qualitatively, if not completely quantitatively, accurate ??24.143.65.75 (talk) 07:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks to all the contributors to this page : it has now been translated into french. Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]