Talk:Dvdisaster

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

As a technical note - The same error correction is already built into CD/DVD/BD media, it is quite robust. Such applications as this add redundant error correction. 69.246.143.46 (talk) 12:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy is good if it remains intact after the source and original error correction data is damaged. If only I knew of a way to use my 500gb disk to store the same sort of data from my 2tb disks as DVDisaster stores from/on DVDs. I just had to replace a 1tb disk after it encountered numerous bad sectors and lost several files. But I suppose this type of redundant error correction data is useless unless it is regenerated every time the data on the source is altered.--86.8.252.7 (talk) 08:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I think the current six references provide sufficient notability. It should also be considered, that this is currently the only software application which uses Reed–Solomon codes specialized for optical media backup. Does uniqueness and innovation not factor into notability? Liawagner (talk) 08:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this were a vote, I would answer "strongly agree" to the last question ; Arny (talk) 08:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dvdisaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527094014/http://pdsmgmt.gsfc.nasa.gov/meetings/2007/mc_march/PMWG-MC_dc-070324%201.pdf to http://pdsmgmt.gsfc.nasa.gov/meetings/2007/mc_march/PMWG-MC_dc-070324%201.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]