Talk:Drunken Master II
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources
[edit]Can we really not find a better source discussing the differences between the US version and the original? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.56.71 (talk) 07:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
I think this film making it to Time's All-Time 100 Movies list(http://www.time.com/time/2005/100movies/the_complete_list.html) is worth mentioning.(Bairuz (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC))
- Go ahead and add it in the Critical Reception section, if you feel it's relevant. I would note that it was compiled in 2005. Gram123 (talk) 15:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Plot?
[edit]Who wrote the plot contained in this article? It barely touches on the plot of the film and completely omits the character names/actors contained within.
Also there is very little, if anything, regarding the fallout between Lau Kar Leung and Jackie Chan, which at the time added a lot of media interest in the film and probably didn't hurt the box office takings in Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.206.254 (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Traditional style?
[edit]"It was Jackie Chan's first traditional style martial arts film since The Young Master (1980)" - was Dragon Lord (1982) not in the traditional style then? If not, why not? --Cal42 (talk) 08:42, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- Dragon Lord places its emphasis on stunts and sports and not traditional martial arts scenes. In the end Jackie basically defeats his ememy by being able to take more punishment while falling than any kind of martial arts skill. Crazymaner2003 (talk) 19:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Drunken Master II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.ew.com/ew/article/review/movie/0,6115,278367_1_0_,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)