Talk:Division of the Mongol Empire

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Division of the Mongol Empire article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Text and/or other creative content from Mongol Empire was copied or moved into Division of the Mongol Empire with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Mongols High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central Asia Mid‑importance

	Asia portal Division of the Mongol Empire is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Good article status?

I can't find the good article review for this article. I've asked the tagger, User:Cartakes, for a link. :) Not only was the article missing the legally mandatory attribution for copying, those references don't look anywhere near GA quality to me, given that some of them are inadequate to identify the source used. Weatherford. p. 120 of what? --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article was created by User:History of Persia. I agree that many text was copied from Mongol Empire at that time, but it is much less so by now since many parts had been cleaned up or rewritten since then. As for the header, sorry, it was my oversight, as the banners were copied from similar articles without changing the class parameter. Thanks for pointing out this, and I have changed it from GA to Class C by now. --Cartakes (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay! Thanks, Cartakes. I don't really expect editors in the ordinary process of things to notice such issues (always nice when people do, though!), but I wanted to be sure to follow up with the GA reviewer if it was overlooked, because checking for copyright issues is part of that process. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:13, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]