Talk:DiscJuggler

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Padus website is down

500 Internal server error. There is a problem with the resource you are looking for, and it cannot be displayed. Bizzybody (talk) 10:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When did you notice? Now? Maybe they're down for maintenance. Fleet Command (talk) 12:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now it only says:

Padus, Inc.

The future is flowing.

I wonder if they have closed their doors.--187.58.71.70 (talk) 08:37, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pure speculation rumor right here (in other words, what I'm writing is not a source): I believe that Padus DiscJuggler, much like EO Video, VisualHub, and other trialware media creators have been cracked to the Nth degree on the Internet, and after while, despite upgrades and such by original programmers, the cracked versions have taken over and they can't make a profit worthwhile anymore. Again, just my idea about it. From my own personal experiences in software programming and publishing, it's tough out there, to make a little ditty that isn't freeware (freeware I've made tons of), and charge anything from $5 to $100. I notice the more expensive my program was, the more is was pirated and cracked. People have no problem sending me up to $20, then the programs start getting cracked. I think DiscJuggler was selling for, what? $70 or something? Apple8800 (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but Wikipedia does not publish ideas. Please do not post stuff like this on talk pages or else you might face their removal. Only say things for which you have source. Fleet Command (talk) 09:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One thing I suggest for the article, other than a detailed re-write and how the program is in heavy use in video game piracy (visit a ROM/ISO site dealing in "gaming history" for a citation on that aspect), but at least noting the main website is down needs to be addressed. (Sorry, I rarely edit articles for fact insertion, I mainly just rephrase terms that are hard to understand, or re-write poorly written sentences.) Apple8800 (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The URL is already tagged, thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 09:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://developer.berlios.de/projects/cdi2iso/

doesn't exist anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.231.61.53 (talk) 18:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DiscJuggler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]