Jump to content

Talk:Dima Bilan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Dima06.jpg

[edit]

Image:Dima06.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?

[edit]

"In 2001, Bilan began dating Eurovision winner Dana International after various recording sessions with the transexual in Milan and Paris." It is a vandalism, I think. So it's out... --Mocu (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Against the Rules

[edit]

In this article Against the Rules is listed as Dimas 5th Albulm but his previous albulm is the same one just in Russian, previosuly Dima has realesed albulms in both English and Russian and they have been counted as one alblum in two different languages. This means that either way Against the Rules is not Dimas 5th albulm either his 4th (in English) or his tenth (if we are counting each albulm to be different). I am not an expert on what should be done here so if someone could please advise and/or remedy the situation. The Quill (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Sure is broken links in here, is there any need for them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.215.89 (talk) 07:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Dima Bilan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dima Bilan/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Media:dimabilan.ogg

Last edited at 10:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 13:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Videography etc

[edit]

Szonline1988, sorry, but in this article that's really not a good thing. As I indicated, the first eight articles listed as Good articles under "Performers" don't have anything like a list of videoclips, and in this article, which has been tagged for its terrible sourcing for years and has a bunch of content (like the other videography part, the awards) that lacks any kind of sourcing, it is just too much: the article looks like a fan page better suited for Wikia. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dima Bilan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]