Talk:Details Cannot Body Wants

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 31 October 2024 by reviewer Tavantius (talk · contribs).

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Details Cannot Body Wants appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 January 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Singapore's first R-rated play was performed despite the police finding parts of it "offensive"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Details Cannot Body Wants.

Wikipedia

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for making an article on Wikipedia. Have you considered nominating it for Wikipedia's Do You Know Otherwise, have a great day!

Tavantius (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 19:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Singapore's first R-rated play was performed despite the police finding it "offensive"?

Source: https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19920909-1.2.63.3.1

Reviewed:
Comment: The article mentions the Public Entertainment Licensing Unit, which is part of the Singapore Police Force. Source: https://www.police.gov.sg/e-Services/Police-Licences/Public-Entertainment-Licence

Created by Imbluey2 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Imbluey2. Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 06:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Imbluey2: Article is new enough. Hook is interesting. I made a few minor copyedits to the article. The article doesn't actually say anything about how the police were involved, so that should be added. The reader will be looking for the police connection. Also, the copyvio detector is at violation possible 49.5% with one of the sources, so some of the stuff highlighted in red there will need to be revised first. Just one more minor thing, I don't think Singapore needs to be bolded in the hook. I think it looks better as "that Singapore's first R-rated play was performed despite the police finding it "offensive"?" Nice work on the article! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator hasn't edited in a few days and didn't respond to the above. Asking if fellow Singaporean DYK regulars Kingoflettuce or ZKang123 can help out. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:38, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Imbluey2: Please respond to the above. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't receive the ping for some odd reason. Anyways, should I just add a footnote in the article explaining that the Entertainment licensing unit is now part of the police? I'll change the stuff that (potentially) violates copyright.

That will work but I think it would be better if the police part was added to the actual body in prose instead of just footnoted. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added it. As for the potential copyright violations, I don't know if I can decrease it much since the texts that are in "violation" are either common phrases or quotes from different sources. But I'll try Imbluey2. Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 12:38, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiOriginal-9:?

Looks like the copyvio tool still doesn't like some of that stuff. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiOriginal-9: got it to 38.7%, which isn't considered a violation. Do you want me to decrease it further? Also, do you think the hook should have an image of the cast? It's in the article as external media but I believe it qualifies under WP: NFC

That still seems a tad high unfortunately. Could you reword stuff a little more and get it to under 20%? Also, only fully-free images are allowed on the main page. Non-free images are not allowed there. Thanks. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiOriginal-9: done. Imbluey2. Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 03:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Imbluey2: That looks good now. Approving the hook. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 04:04, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Imbluey2 and WikiOriginal-9: the source just says that PELU found parts of the play offensive and blacked those out, not that they found the entire play offensive. Could the hook be updated to match? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 16:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 4th excerpt of the source says "it was only Chin's play [Details Cannot Body Wants] that was deemed "offensive" by the Public Entertainment Licensing Unit"" so I'm not sure the hook is wrong. Though the last excerpt also says "certain passages which were marked out by Pelu as "offensive", so if you want to revise it feel free. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron: I don't mind to be honest, feel free to change it. Imbluey2. Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 02:45, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the nomination is already over two months old; as such, the nomination will be marked for closure if the issues are not addressed within a reasonable timeframe. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1: ... that Singapore's first R-rated play was performed despite the police finding parts of it "offensive"?

Sources: https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19920909-1.2.63.3.1]

@Narutolovehinata5: ALT1 added. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- works for me :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 03:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]