Talk:Demolition of the Inter-Korean Liaison Office

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles

Korea

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Proposed merge of Inter-Korean Liaison Office with Bombing of the Inter-Korean Liaison Office

This article about the destruction of the building is duplicative of material at the article of the building itself. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 10:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This should be merged into Inter-Korean Liaison Office. Aside from the WP:POVTITLE, we don't need a separate article for the destruction of the building. We're not likely to find out much more than we know now. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 10:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This is a major escalation of this conflict. A separate article is needed.BabbaQ (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Both articles are tiny, the naming is dubious, and there is no need for the bombing to exist as a separate page. Even if it's notable it can be included on the office page per WP:NOPAGE. — Amakuru (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Amakuru. A bombing subsection on the office's main article is sufficient. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 21:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, all information can be summed up in the article. JE98 (talk) 23:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Calling this a bombing is misleading and makes it sound like an attack. They blew up their own building, in their own country. Every indication is that they were planning this ahead of time. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 15:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, should be referred to as a demolition. Step hen 00:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unattributed

This article was an unattributed cut-and-paste fork of the main article, and as such I've redirected it back to the source. Step hen 00:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a simple cut and paste, some material was taken from the main article, while information originally written here was copied to the main article. ⑉⑉Mccunicano ☕️ 01:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]